inequality?
Q. normal body temperature is 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Write an inequality that describes the temperature T in degrees Fahrenheit of people with above normal temperature. how to write an inequality for this? explain.
Asked by crayola - Mon Jan 7 21:04:42 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The inequality would be values of T greater than 98.6... T > 98.6 It's really that simple.
Answered by Puzzling - Mon Jan 7 21:07:10 2008
Q. normal body temperature is 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Write an inequality that describes the temperature T in degrees Fahrenheit of people with above normal temperature. how to write an inequality for this? explain.
Asked by crayola - Mon Jan 7 21:04:42 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The inequality would be values of T greater than 98.6... T > 98.6 It's really that simple.
Answered by Puzzling - Mon Jan 7 21:07:10 2008
How is gender inequality present in a girl working at a nursing home and a boy working as a teacher?
Q. The text is Touch by Lakambini Sitoy. Anything from the text that depicts gender inequality, please explain! ANYTHING!
Asked by Line - Fri Feb 13 00:28:38 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. That situation does little to support the notion of inequality between the genders as teaching is traditionally considered a "woman's" field, and nursery is traditionally considered a "man's field."
Answered by Pat - Mon Feb 16 18:09:31 2009
Q. The text is Touch by Lakambini Sitoy. Anything from the text that depicts gender inequality, please explain! ANYTHING!
Asked by Line - Fri Feb 13 00:28:38 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. That situation does little to support the notion of inequality between the genders as teaching is traditionally considered a "woman's" field, and nursery is traditionally considered a "man's field."
Answered by Pat - Mon Feb 16 18:09:31 2009
What are your thoughts of racial and ethnic inequality?
Q. Im doing a project for my sociology class. I have to come up with the problem and a hypothesis. What do you guys think of this, does it make sense? And what are your thoughts of racial and ethnic inequality? Define the problem: Different racial and ethnic groups are unequal in resources, power and prestige. Hypothesis: Based on our research, we hypothesize that racial inequality has been annihilated on paper and the way we socialize, but not ideology.
Asked by Huge_Boto - Mon Mar 16 03:50:04 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. When we understand we are the same and all different, and we stop labelling one another with such phrases as (ethnic groups) plus realise that not all peoples want the same, what is ideology in your eyes may well not be in mine.
Answered by nilsgil - Mon Mar 16 05:37:13 2009
Q. Im doing a project for my sociology class. I have to come up with the problem and a hypothesis. What do you guys think of this, does it make sense? And what are your thoughts of racial and ethnic inequality? Define the problem: Different racial and ethnic groups are unequal in resources, power and prestige. Hypothesis: Based on our research, we hypothesize that racial inequality has been annihilated on paper and the way we socialize, but not ideology.
Asked by Huge_Boto - Mon Mar 16 03:50:04 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. When we understand we are the same and all different, and we stop labelling one another with such phrases as (ethnic groups) plus realise that not all peoples want the same, what is ideology in your eyes may well not be in mine.
Answered by nilsgil - Mon Mar 16 05:37:13 2009
How do you know the value of a solution for an inequality?
Q. How do you know if a value is a solution for an inequality? How is this different from determining if a value is a solution to an equation? If you replace the equal sign of an equation with an inequality sign, is there ever a time when the same value will be a solution to both the equation and inequality? Write an inequality and provide a value. Your value may either be a solution or not be a solution to your inequality.
Asked by jd_demay - Thu Jul 16 19:42:00 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A value is a solution for an inequality if it makes the statement true. For example, if you have x + 3 > 9, then 15 would be a solution since 15 + 3 > 9. If you replace an = sign with a > or < sign, then there would never be a time when the solution to the equation would be the same as the inequality. This would only work if you use >= or <= signs instead of > or <.
Answered by igorotboy - Mon Jul 20 12:57:26 2009
Q. How do you know if a value is a solution for an inequality? How is this different from determining if a value is a solution to an equation? If you replace the equal sign of an equation with an inequality sign, is there ever a time when the same value will be a solution to both the equation and inequality? Write an inequality and provide a value. Your value may either be a solution or not be a solution to your inequality.
Asked by jd_demay - Thu Jul 16 19:42:00 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A value is a solution for an inequality if it makes the statement true. For example, if you have x + 3 > 9, then 15 would be a solution since 15 + 3 > 9. If you replace an = sign with a > or < sign, then there would never be a time when the solution to the equation would be the same as the inequality. This would only work if you use >= or <= signs instead of > or <.
Answered by igorotboy - Mon Jul 20 12:57:26 2009
Why does the inequality sign change when both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number?
Q. Why does the inequality sign change when both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number? Does this happen with equations?
Asked by unknown - Wed Sep 16 15:59:16 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Consider the statement 4 < 7, which is true. If you multiply both sides by -1 but you did not change the direction of the sign you would have -4 < -7, which is a false statement. Therefore, the direction must be changed, as well: -4 > -7. Yes, this holds true for equations, as well. 2 - 3x > 5 -3x > 3 (and now divide by -3) x < -1
Answered by Mathsorcerer - Wed Sep 16 16:05:15 2009
Q. Why does the inequality sign change when both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number? Does this happen with equations?
Asked by unknown - Wed Sep 16 15:59:16 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Consider the statement 4 < 7, which is true. If you multiply both sides by -1 but you did not change the direction of the sign you would have -4 < -7, which is a false statement. Therefore, the direction must be changed, as well: -4 > -7. Yes, this holds true for equations, as well. 2 - 3x > 5 -3x > 3 (and now divide by -3) x < -1
Answered by Mathsorcerer - Wed Sep 16 16:05:15 2009
What role did the government have in combating gender inequality, in changing the ideas of the feminine mystiq?
Q. What role did the government have in combating gender inequality, in changing the ideas of the feminine mystique. Any Ideas would be greatfull. This is part of an essay of which I have no idea on what to talk about.
Asked by Alucard - Sat May 2 23:38:37 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Government curtailed men's rights and continues to violate the US constitution (Bill of rights)(13th amendment that bars slavery) to the point that divorce is slavery if not outright murder for men. As per women in relation to the government several federal court rulings have ruled that women are lesser than men(reasonable woman court rulings) in mental and emotional faculties and view's women as wards of the state mostly given the rise of palimony support, obscene child and alimony rulings and the kid's gloves in criminal matters.
Answered by Corathin - Sun May 3 00:40:36 2009
Q. What role did the government have in combating gender inequality, in changing the ideas of the feminine mystique. Any Ideas would be greatfull. This is part of an essay of which I have no idea on what to talk about.
Asked by Alucard - Sat May 2 23:38:37 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Government curtailed men's rights and continues to violate the US constitution (Bill of rights)(13th amendment that bars slavery) to the point that divorce is slavery if not outright murder for men. As per women in relation to the government several federal court rulings have ruled that women are lesser than men(reasonable woman court rulings) in mental and emotional faculties and view's women as wards of the state mostly given the rise of palimony support, obscene child and alimony rulings and the kid's gloves in criminal matters.
Answered by Corathin - Sun May 3 00:40:36 2009
How do you kknow if a value is a sloution for an inequality?
Q. How is this different from determining if a value is a solution to an equation? If you replace the equal sign of an equation with and inequality sign, is there ever a time when the same value will be a solution to both the equation and the inequality?
Asked by shanna h - Thu Feb 21 20:33:45 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, an inequality shows two statements that are true if and only if one statement differs from the other by being greater than, less than, or equal to the other. For example: x + 1 > 3 If you change the > to =, then we get x to be: x = 2 Now we re-substitute the > x > 2 Meaning that x + 1 > 3 is true ONLY for all x > 2. Therefore x = 2 is the solution of the equation, but 2 is NOT a solution of the inequality. Inequalities have multiple solutions, while equations have unique solutions. If the solution is a solution of the inequality, it will not be a solution of the equation formed from the inequality UNLESS the inequality has a greater than or equal to sign OR a less than or equal to sign, in which case, x = the same value that… [cont.]
Answered by A b z m b i - Thu Feb 21 20:37:01 2008
Q. How is this different from determining if a value is a solution to an equation? If you replace the equal sign of an equation with and inequality sign, is there ever a time when the same value will be a solution to both the equation and the inequality?
Asked by shanna h - Thu Feb 21 20:33:45 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, an inequality shows two statements that are true if and only if one statement differs from the other by being greater than, less than, or equal to the other. For example: x + 1 > 3 If you change the > to =, then we get x to be: x = 2 Now we re-substitute the > x > 2 Meaning that x + 1 > 3 is true ONLY for all x > 2. Therefore x = 2 is the solution of the equation, but 2 is NOT a solution of the inequality. Inequalities have multiple solutions, while equations have unique solutions. If the solution is a solution of the inequality, it will not be a solution of the equation formed from the inequality UNLESS the inequality has a greater than or equal to sign OR a less than or equal to sign, in which case, x = the same value that… [cont.]
Answered by A b z m b i - Thu Feb 21 20:37:01 2008
How do you know if a value is a solution for an inequality?
Q. How do you know if a value is a solution for an inequality? How is this different from determining if a value is a solution to an equation? If you replace the equal sign of an equation with an inequality sign, is there ever a time when the same value will be a solution to both the equation and the inequality? Write an inequality and provide a value that may or may not be a solution to the inequality.
Asked by Cathey P - Mon Jul 21 15:43:42 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. HI, suppose tthe inequality is x > 2, and thus its equation is x = 2 therefore for such inequality values the solution is anything above 2 i.e. 2.1, 2.2, 3, 6 , 99 etc but for the equation there is only one solution and that is 2. and in this case the solutions are different. No there can never be a time when the solution of inequality has the same value of that of the equation. this is because, equations generally have one or two or theree or atleast finite solutions but inequalities have infinite solutions. Now again for the inequality x>2, 2 is not its solution but 2.2 is. Hope to answer you well. keep smiling. bye.
Answered by asad meer - Mon Jul 21 15:58:20 2008
Q. How do you know if a value is a solution for an inequality? How is this different from determining if a value is a solution to an equation? If you replace the equal sign of an equation with an inequality sign, is there ever a time when the same value will be a solution to both the equation and the inequality? Write an inequality and provide a value that may or may not be a solution to the inequality.
Asked by Cathey P - Mon Jul 21 15:43:42 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. HI, suppose tthe inequality is x > 2, and thus its equation is x = 2 therefore for such inequality values the solution is anything above 2 i.e. 2.1, 2.2, 3, 6 , 99 etc but for the equation there is only one solution and that is 2. and in this case the solutions are different. No there can never be a time when the solution of inequality has the same value of that of the equation. this is because, equations generally have one or two or theree or atleast finite solutions but inequalities have infinite solutions. Now again for the inequality x>2, 2 is not its solution but 2.2 is. Hope to answer you well. keep smiling. bye.
Answered by asad meer - Mon Jul 21 15:58:20 2008
How to tell the difference between an "and" and "or" compound inequality?
Q. I'm having serious problems in my Algebra II / Trig class when it comes to compound inequalities. I don't understand how to tell the difference between an "and" and "or" compound inequality WITHOUT solving the inequality. For example: 7 |2s-3| How can I turn this into a compound inequality WITHOUT finding the solution?
Asked by rogers11 - Thu Oct 2 20:31:57 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If the absolute value part is less than a number (or if the number is greater than the absolute value, like here) then it is a conjunction, and. This is because the absolute value is less than or equal to 7 which means it's between -7 and 7, so 2s-3 -7 and 2s-3 7. Since these can both be true, "and" will work. The other way around it would be either above 7 or below -7 which can't both happen at the same time so it would have to be "or".
Answered by hayharbr - Thu Oct 2 20:39:35 2008
Q. I'm having serious problems in my Algebra II / Trig class when it comes to compound inequalities. I don't understand how to tell the difference between an "and" and "or" compound inequality WITHOUT solving the inequality. For example: 7 |2s-3| How can I turn this into a compound inequality WITHOUT finding the solution?
Asked by rogers11 - Thu Oct 2 20:31:57 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If the absolute value part is less than a number (or if the number is greater than the absolute value, like here) then it is a conjunction, and. This is because the absolute value is less than or equal to 7 which means it's between -7 and 7, so 2s-3 -7 and 2s-3 7. Since these can both be true, "and" will work. The other way around it would be either above 7 or below -7 which can't both happen at the same time so it would have to be "or".
Answered by hayharbr - Thu Oct 2 20:39:35 2008
What exactly is 'urban inequality' and what are a few examples?
Q. I'm writing a report on urbanization and how it associates with urban inequality in China and India. Can someone give a few examples? Does it just deal with income, housing, gender, and for example, how some people are 'rich' and some are 'poor' , some in good houses some in bad?
Asked by cb - Thu Feb 12 04:24:39 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. In any transitioning economy. The wealth gap spreads tremendously. Fo example, during the industrial revolution the wealth gap between rich and poor sky rocket... in every country!!! The two examples, in which the wealth gap, didnt create a massive gap are China and Russia the communist countries; however, those countries became massively corrupted. Is it a coincidence, that the wealth gap today in both of these countries is one of the widest gaps in the world??? Of course not, it turns out during the communist eras the wealthy were racking in tons of money compared to the poor. Moscow has one of the highest populations of poor in the world; however, for some reason it has one of the highest concentrations of billionaires??? WTF Lets get… [cont.]
Answered by MAkav3li - Thu Feb 12 04:41:09 2009
Q. I'm writing a report on urbanization and how it associates with urban inequality in China and India. Can someone give a few examples? Does it just deal with income, housing, gender, and for example, how some people are 'rich' and some are 'poor' , some in good houses some in bad?
Asked by cb - Thu Feb 12 04:24:39 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. In any transitioning economy. The wealth gap spreads tremendously. Fo example, during the industrial revolution the wealth gap between rich and poor sky rocket... in every country!!! The two examples, in which the wealth gap, didnt create a massive gap are China and Russia the communist countries; however, those countries became massively corrupted. Is it a coincidence, that the wealth gap today in both of these countries is one of the widest gaps in the world??? Of course not, it turns out during the communist eras the wealthy were racking in tons of money compared to the poor. Moscow has one of the highest populations of poor in the world; however, for some reason it has one of the highest concentrations of billionaires??? WTF Lets get… [cont.]
Answered by MAkav3li - Thu Feb 12 04:41:09 2009
How can I prove the triangle inequality theorem?
Q. For a secondary school student, what are the most appropriate ways to prove triangle inequality theorem? Please tell me as many ways as you can.
Asked by a? [S]and{Y} a? - Sat Mar 17 02:59:21 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There is an activity you could try. Try it: Take 9 sticks. Make three different sets such that: In Set 1, the sum of the length of two sticks is smaller than the length of the third. In Set 2, the sum of the length of two sticks is equal to the length of the third. In Set 3, the sum of the length of two stick is larger than the length of the third. Try making triangles with each of the 3 sets. Only Set 3 gives a triangle.
Answered by The Undertaker - Sat Mar 17 03:39:33 2007
Q. For a secondary school student, what are the most appropriate ways to prove triangle inequality theorem? Please tell me as many ways as you can.
Asked by a? [S]and{Y} a? - Sat Mar 17 02:59:21 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There is an activity you could try. Try it: Take 9 sticks. Make three different sets such that: In Set 1, the sum of the length of two sticks is smaller than the length of the third. In Set 2, the sum of the length of two sticks is equal to the length of the third. In Set 3, the sum of the length of two stick is larger than the length of the third. Try making triangles with each of the 3 sets. Only Set 3 gives a triangle.
Answered by The Undertaker - Sat Mar 17 03:39:33 2007
How to determine which side the linear inequality is shaded?
Q. I'm learning about linear equations and I have a question. How to determine which side the linear inequality is shaded? (Math isn't my strongest subject.) Best answer gets 10 points. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
Asked by yankees fan 4ever - Wed Jan 14 14:28:42 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. easier way, graph like it was an equal sign (note: dashed line if only < or > sign; solid if <= or >= Now, pick a point, I usually use the origin, x=0, y=0 and plug this back into the original equation. Now see if the statement is true. If yes, shade side of line containing origin, if false, shade opposite side. an example. x+y>1 graph now plug in 0,0 and you get 0>1 this is false, so you shade the side not containing the origin. this always works!!! good luck - M
Answered by Maverick - Wed Jan 14 14:40:19 2009
Q. I'm learning about linear equations and I have a question. How to determine which side the linear inequality is shaded? (Math isn't my strongest subject.) Best answer gets 10 points. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
Asked by yankees fan 4ever - Wed Jan 14 14:28:42 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. easier way, graph like it was an equal sign (note: dashed line if only < or > sign; solid if <= or >= Now, pick a point, I usually use the origin, x=0, y=0 and plug this back into the original equation. Now see if the statement is true. If yes, shade side of line containing origin, if false, shade opposite side. an example. x+y>1 graph now plug in 0,0 and you get 0>1 this is false, so you shade the side not containing the origin. this always works!!! good luck - M
Answered by Maverick - Wed Jan 14 14:40:19 2009
What are the causes of US income distribution inequality?
Q. According the Gini Index, the U.S. has one of the most unequal patterns of income distribution among developed countries. what are the causes of this inequality?
Asked by Simon Y - Tue Dec 11 15:50:42 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Relatively low taxes on high levels of income ($1 million and up), low taxes on wealth and inheritances, low taxes on capital gains.
Answered by Hubris252 - Tue Dec 11 16:37:43 2007
Q. According the Gini Index, the U.S. has one of the most unequal patterns of income distribution among developed countries. what are the causes of this inequality?
Asked by Simon Y - Tue Dec 11 15:50:42 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Relatively low taxes on high levels of income ($1 million and up), low taxes on wealth and inheritances, low taxes on capital gains.
Answered by Hubris252 - Tue Dec 11 16:37:43 2007
What costs inequality in the distribution of income?
Q. i am doing a economy assignment this is my first term of studying this subject and i found it really hard. please help! question above. as well as these below if possible! how will market economy lead to market failure? how can government help to fix the inequality? plus, i have tried to research on net. but i cant find any helpful ones! thank you btw i am in australia.
Asked by Sabrina P - Sat Apr 12 03:23:52 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Mostly intelligence and the drive to work. Read "IQ And Wealth Of Nations" by Richard Lynn. However, once a family has money, it is not that difficult to keep it and increase your wealth. It takes a real wash out to lose inherited wealth. Look at our president. What a zero, but yu can bet that he has greatly increased his fortune being president.
Answered by +?!E-?!B - Sat Apr 12 03:26:49 2008
Q. i am doing a economy assignment this is my first term of studying this subject and i found it really hard. please help! question above. as well as these below if possible! how will market economy lead to market failure? how can government help to fix the inequality? plus, i have tried to research on net. but i cant find any helpful ones! thank you btw i am in australia.
Asked by Sabrina P - Sat Apr 12 03:23:52 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Mostly intelligence and the drive to work. Read "IQ And Wealth Of Nations" by Richard Lynn. However, once a family has money, it is not that difficult to keep it and increase your wealth. It takes a real wash out to lose inherited wealth. Look at our president. What a zero, but yu can bet that he has greatly increased his fortune being president.
Answered by +?!E-?!B - Sat Apr 12 03:26:49 2008
Why does the inequality sign change when both sides are multiplied or divided?
Q. Why does the inequality sign change when both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number? Does this happen with equations? why or why not.
Asked by ladybug - Mon Oct 27 08:18:39 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Ok, the only time the sign changes it's you divide by a negative number. In order words, the number that is with the variable, if thats negative...then the sign will change for sure...Hope that helps!!! :) It changes because thats just the rules.
Answered by spanishgrl - Mon Oct 27 08:52:15 2008
Q. Why does the inequality sign change when both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number? Does this happen with equations? why or why not.
Asked by ladybug - Mon Oct 27 08:18:39 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Ok, the only time the sign changes it's you divide by a negative number. In order words, the number that is with the variable, if thats negative...then the sign will change for sure...Hope that helps!!! :) It changes because thats just the rules.
Answered by spanishgrl - Mon Oct 27 08:52:15 2008
What would you do to reduce income inequality?
Q. What kind of economic policies would you advocate to reduce the level of income inequality in the United States back down to the same level it was at before Ronald Reagan's time? attention: Please do not answer this question if you are fundamentally opposed to the idea of actively reducing inequality. Such answers will receive an automatic thumb down. I am also referring to ideas to reduce class divisions in general, including classist attitudes.
Asked by Kronner 82 - Sun Jun 24 17:28:10 2007 - - 17 Answers - 0 Comments
A. One way would be to tie the salaries of the top management directly to that of the lowest paid employees. first pick a number 20,50,100 times earnings between the two, then when the top feel that they need a raise they would be required to increase the salaries at the bottom to maintain the same ratio of times earnings. all types of compensation would be included to get a fair,level playing field. as long as the rich have the ability to protect them selves through tax shelters and loopholes and the poor don't have anything to lose the middle class will become extinct and the U.S. will become just anther third world country. truly great societies are not measured by there advances,military power,etc. but by the differences between the top… [cont.]
Answered by Constipated CON. - Mon Jul 2 14:40:38 2007
Q. What kind of economic policies would you advocate to reduce the level of income inequality in the United States back down to the same level it was at before Ronald Reagan's time? attention: Please do not answer this question if you are fundamentally opposed to the idea of actively reducing inequality. Such answers will receive an automatic thumb down. I am also referring to ideas to reduce class divisions in general, including classist attitudes.
Asked by Kronner 82 - Sun Jun 24 17:28:10 2007 - - 17 Answers - 0 Comments
A. One way would be to tie the salaries of the top management directly to that of the lowest paid employees. first pick a number 20,50,100 times earnings between the two, then when the top feel that they need a raise they would be required to increase the salaries at the bottom to maintain the same ratio of times earnings. all types of compensation would be included to get a fair,level playing field. as long as the rich have the ability to protect them selves through tax shelters and loopholes and the poor don't have anything to lose the middle class will become extinct and the U.S. will become just anther third world country. truly great societies are not measured by there advances,military power,etc. but by the differences between the top… [cont.]
Answered by Constipated CON. - Mon Jul 2 14:40:38 2007
Why is it necessary to reverse the inequality symbol when multiplying both sides of an equality by a negative ?
Q. In an algebra equation, why is it necessary to reverse the inequality symbol when multiplying both sides of an inequality by a negative number?
Asked by leslie c - Tue Jan 20 03:15:19 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. look at it simply 2 > 1 but if we multiply by -1, -2 < -1 it is enough to understand it by a simple example
Answered by M3 - Tue Jan 20 03:25:51 2009
Q. In an algebra equation, why is it necessary to reverse the inequality symbol when multiplying both sides of an inequality by a negative number?
Asked by leslie c - Tue Jan 20 03:15:19 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. look at it simply 2 > 1 but if we multiply by -1, -2 < -1 it is enough to understand it by a simple example
Answered by M3 - Tue Jan 20 03:25:51 2009
How do you know if value is a solution for an inequality? How is this different from determining if value ?
Q. If you replace the equal sign of an equation with an inequality sign, is there ever a time when the same value will be a solution to both the equation and the inequality? Write an inequality and provide a value that may or may not be a solution to the inequality.
Asked by juiceyfruit10 - Thu Jan 22 18:50:04 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. All details are on their home page
Answered by Citroen Technician - Mon Jan 26 17:26:56 2009
Q. If you replace the equal sign of an equation with an inequality sign, is there ever a time when the same value will be a solution to both the equation and the inequality? Write an inequality and provide a value that may or may not be a solution to the inequality.
Asked by juiceyfruit10 - Thu Jan 22 18:50:04 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. All details are on their home page
Answered by Citroen Technician - Mon Jan 26 17:26:56 2009
Why it is necessary to reverse the inequality symbol when multiplying?
Q. Why it is necessary to reverse the inequality symbol when multiplying both sides of an inequality by a negative number? Can you give an example!!!
Asked by Mazepanic - Sat Oct 6 19:21:12 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. View the inequality as two knots in a string extending away from you through a zero point. One represents a larger value and the other a smaller value. Changing the signs is equivalent to swinging the string 180 degrees around the zero point. The one that was closer to you is now the one farther away and vice versa. This means that the value that was larger is now smaller, etc. The other responder's examples are good ones.
Answered by Tom K - Sat Oct 6 19:34:19 2007
Q. Why it is necessary to reverse the inequality symbol when multiplying both sides of an inequality by a negative number? Can you give an example!!!
Asked by Mazepanic - Sat Oct 6 19:21:12 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. View the inequality as two knots in a string extending away from you through a zero point. One represents a larger value and the other a smaller value. Changing the signs is equivalent to swinging the string 180 degrees around the zero point. The one that was closer to you is now the one farther away and vice versa. This means that the value that was larger is now smaller, etc. The other responder's examples are good ones.
Answered by Tom K - Sat Oct 6 19:34:19 2007
What are some good conservative arguments against the notion that inequality is destroying America?
Q. I have to give a Political speech for a course, and I am suppose to have argue that inequality is not destroying America. Are there any good conservative studies, articles or journal articles that could that be used for a speech? Wow. No good answers.
Asked by SadWoman - Wed Feb 4 17:23:19 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Inequality is destroying America. Because inequality grows. There are no good arguments against it. Because of that they use lies.
Answered by wolf - Wed Feb 4 17:41:05 2009
Q. I have to give a Political speech for a course, and I am suppose to have argue that inequality is not destroying America. Are there any good conservative studies, articles or journal articles that could that be used for a speech? Wow. No good answers.
Asked by SadWoman - Wed Feb 4 17:23:19 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Inequality is destroying America. Because inequality grows. There are no good arguments against it. Because of that they use lies.
Answered by wolf - Wed Feb 4 17:41:05 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'Inequality'
Wed Mar 3 08:15:33 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
news.google.com
MedPage Today
The vast majority of the US population lives within two hours of a dedicated burn center by ground or helicopter, ...
and more »
photos.upi.com
500px x 358px | 34.20kB
[source page]
L R Sally Struthers Mark Indelicato and Kerry Butler arrive at the Defying Inequality The Broadway Concert A Celebrity Benefit for Equal Rights at the Gershwin Theatre in New York on February 23 2009 UPI Photo Laura Cavanaugh News Photos UPI com
dmiblog.com
Amy Traub
hu, 14 Jan 2010 18:23:26 GM
But if you imagined that the superrich might actually be losing more ground than the rest of us, that one silver lining to the economic crisis might be less . inequality. , you would be wrong. As the return to mega-bonuses on Wall Street ...
[Hide]▲
