|
In economics and business, wealth (or net worth) of a person, household, or nation is the value of all assets owned net of all liabilities owed (to foreigners in the national accounts) at a point in time. The term may also be used more broadly as referring to the productive capacity of a society or as a contrast to poverty. Analytical emphasis may be on its determinants or distribution. Economic terminology distinguishes between two types of variables: a stock and a flow. Wealth, as measurable at a date in time, is a stock, like the value of an orchard on December 31 minus debt owed on the orchard. For a given amount of wealth, say at the beginning of the year, income from that wealth, as measurable over say a year is a flow. What marks the income as a flow is its measurement per unit of time, like the value of apples yielded from the orchard per year. In macroeconomic theory the 'wealth effect' may refer to the increase in aggregate consumption from an increase in national wealth. One measure of it is the wealth elasticity of demand. It is the percentage change in the amount demanded of consumption for each one-percent change in wealth. Wealth may be measured in nominal or real values. The assets include those that are tangible (land and capital) and financial (money, bonds, etc.). Measurable wealth typically excludes intangible or nonmarketable assets such as human capital and social capital. In economics, 'wealth' corresponds to the accounting term 'net worth'. But analysis may adapt typical accounting conventions for economic purposes in social accounting (such as in national accounts). An example of the latter is generational accounting of social security systems to include the present value projected future outlays considered as liabilities. Macroeocnomic questions include whether the issuance of government bonds affects investment and consumption through the wealth effect. Environmental assets are not usually ccounted in measuring wealth, in part due to the difficulty of valuing environmental assets. However, it has been argued that although imperfect, an educated valuation is superior to a value of zero (as the implied valuation of environmental assets). From Wikipedia under the
GNU Free Documentation License Is trickle down economics spreading the wealth around? Q. Is trickle down economics spreading the wealth around? Asked by my2 - Sun Oct 26 22:01:54 2008 - - 12 Answers - 0 Comments A. No, that's been tried by the Republicans and it never actually trickled down. That's why we, the poor and middle class have to bail out the economy while the rich people all got golden parachutes and Yachts and dozens of million dollar homes...Like John and Cindy McCain. I think it's time to try trickle up. Answered by Qatar - Sun Oct 26 22:06:01 2008 Is 7 years of supply side economics a success? Q. After 7 seven years it's time to review the success of supply side economics. The trickle down effect appears pretty clear. Upper income Americans have been able to invest more money and increase their wealth. Middle income Americans have lost some of the purchasing power of their dollar and value in their homes. Lower income Americans have become identified as irresponsible losers. I am not quite sure as to what exactly is trickling down from the top? Any thoughts? Asked by Perplexed Bob - Tue Jan 8 10:56:05 2008 - - 13 Answers - 0 Comments A. Bob, I know you know there is more to it than supply side economics. You know more about economics than me. But you also need to factor in overspending by a Republican congress, two disasters, 9/11 and Katrina. None of which have anything to do with supply side economics. Some would say over spending has everything to do with supply-side economics, but there is a difference between cutting taxes to spur growth to increase revenue, and just be completely stupid with money. But you have a point with dropping value of homes. The brief story is people were buying like crazy, so builders were building like crazy. And the lenders were all too willing to loan money with horrible terms. Borrowers accepted the terms to flip homes, but some… [cont.] Answered by robling_dwrdesign - Tue Jan 8 14:11:40 2008 Should I get a BBA or BA in Economics?
Q. In a BBA program in Economics, I will take Economics classes along with the business core that people in marketing, accounting, and real estate are taking. In a BA program, I'll be able to get the same Economics classes but I'll get to choose a minor and take many electives such as sociology and public policy classes. Which one will better prepare me for working in the economic field? (I am very interested in demographics, income statistics, and wealth disparities if that changes anything) Asked by cbarclay15 - Sat Nov 15 18:52:03 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments A. BBA all the way. More opportunities. Answered by Derek - Sat Nov 15 18:54:34 2008 From Yahoo Answer Search: "Wealth (economics)"
See also:
Yellow book ranks China 7th in overall strength
China Daily Military spending has risen dramatically while the worldwide economic downturn has vaporized wealth for almost everyone in 2009, said the book. ... and more » The 100 best fiction, nonfiction books of 2009
San Francisco Chronicle Authors produced a wealth of diverse memoirs, definitive biographies and memorable novels. It was also a remarkable year for short story collections, ... and more » No pain, no gain as states get a lesson in economics
The Australian THE global financial crisis laid bare a harsh economic truth: luck may play its part, but management matters. Just as it separated good financial ... From Google News Search: "Wealth (economics)" 987 jpg
391px x 261px | 75.80kB [source page] Common Wealth Economics for a Crowded Planet The Stamford Raffles Lecture is the foremost event in ZSL s annual programme of scientific meetings Established in 1995 the lectures have been given by eminent speakers on a wide range of From Yahoo Image Search: "Wealth (economics)" calling it: Kurt Richebaecher in 2004 on The Coming Economic Bust
Greg Ransom ue, 14 Jul 2009 07:57:44 GM wealth. creation though soaring asset prices has been driven by ultra-cheap and loose money and credit, and not by saving and investment Richebaecher (2006a:4). Just before the turning of the US housing market in summer 2006, ... Change in NCR Lands garb policy? What difference from the 20-years ...
hornbillunleashed Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:05:29 GM Yes, the equation is quite right vast land poverty as how basic . Economics. 101 would tell anyone. So, the publicly stated intention is great vast lands = . wealth. . Well, I have to be so optimistic here in order not to doubt the ... Help Build The Economic Populist | The Economic Populist
Robert Oak Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:28:44 GM Do you think the term Emerging Market is just codespeak for . wealth. transfer?: yes. no. need more information . ... There is no other . economics. focused site out there with these kind of features. All of them are just a select few authors. We even have content promotion and demotion so users are the editors to determine what is on the front page! This site is great, the people on it are great so let's grow the site! Bookmark/Search this post with: ... From Google Blog Search: "Wealth (economics)" |
Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF)
SSRN listings for JEL E21: Consumption; Saving
Wealth is a Zero-Sum Game





